Search Style Sheets: Your Photos, Your Looks

• Follow on Google Plus
• Follow on Pinterest
• Follow @sportsgrid
• Like us on Facebook

• http://twitter.com/kathy_kitt ksqared

  Yuck!

• Kahlid Shiek Yerbouti

  What’s it called, the “Sandusky Line?”

• Anonymous

  Ew… how weird.

• DKK

  That was funny!

• Anonymous

  Don’t worry, the media will soon explain how intolerant we are.

• Anonymous

  Here’s the thing: no prepubescent girl can even go in and buy them. PARENTS buy them for their kids. The fault is laid there. If the parents didn’t buy them, the product wouldn’t exist. Pure supply and demand.

• Kid Dynamite

  This just in — Safeway sells condoms for 1 year olds because it displays them in the same aisle as Gerber baby products (bottles, pacifiers, etc).

  Did you try them on a 7-year old to verify your allegation, or did you just repeat Jezebel’s headline without thinking?

• Anonymous

  People are twisted and here is just more proof.  This isn’t just something that shouldn’t be sold, it’s something that no one should manufacture.

  I agree that parents are responsible for what their children have access to, but I also thing that manufacturers and stores are responsible for what they make and what they offer on a retail level. 

  I wouldn’t shop there just for this reason.  Shouldn’t support clueless jerks trying to make a buck off of the inappropriate.

• Guest

  If an item is sized marked for a 7 year old Kid
  Dynamite….that is who they were made for…geesh moron

• Anonymous

  Law enforcement should grab the sales receipts and quickly go after the sickos who actually BOUGHT some of the crotchless child undies. The store should be considered co-conspirators if and when the crotchless child undies show up during a child kidnapping, molestation, and murder investigation.

• Anonymous

  If the liberals had their way, every seven year-old girl in America would be wearing crotchless panties and having monthly abortions.

  Sick & twisted is the only logical way one can look at this…

• http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SIYF5565LXG7BBKTKGSSFWU7TA The Rock

  All of your claims are baseless and lies are a prude. You don’t know what your talking about.

• http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SIYF5565LXG7BBKTKGSSFWU7TA The Rock

  I lay blame on the parents that would buy a thong for a 7 year old. A&F sold bikini’s for 7 year olds I think they had to pull it because of the outrage I heard that on Across America With Spencer Hughs on Fox Radio this past spring maybe it was summer.

• Anonymous

  Rock, I made no claims and told no lies. I DO know what I’m talking about but YOU, who knows . . . . you can’t tell Spring from Summer.

• http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MDT3DQ7IHS3SQOR7B3VN3ZDGBU Alexandra

  Gross!

• Hillarity1

  why aren’t these mfrs brought to court for distributing these highly sexual panties? the pedophiles will surely love these kids if they can catch them. what parent would encourage their doll playing child to wear these panties?

• http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1644807885 Thomas Pelto

  EVEN IF THEY WEREN’T CROTCHLESS… WTF? why should there be thongs to fit 7yr. olds Or even 14-15 yr. olds, if you ask me!!  PARENTS DO need to get on top of this!!! I mean I was young once too, and at 13-14-15, yeah; you’re always wishing that you were older. Still it boggles my mind that a parent would let their daughter at 13-14-15 wear thongs and low rider jeans so that it’s readily apparent they’re wearing thongs!! Not to mention all the makeup, eyeliner, eyeshadow, lipstick…. Absolutely NONE of this is appropriate until they are 18!!!