1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

WATCH: Jennifer Love Hewitt Will Not Be Insuring Her Breasts For $5M

by Hilary George-Parkin | 12:42 pm, March 19th, 2013


Last week, Jennifer Love Hewitt sat down for an interview with USA Today to promote the second season of her highbrow guilty pleasure Lifetime series, The Client List. Naturally, the conversation turned to her breasts — or, more specifically, whether she’d ever consider taking a cue from Heidi Klum and taking out an insurance policy on them (they’re quite the valuable asset, you see). Hewitt responded that she’d do it for a cool $5 million, but backtracked last night on Jimmy Kimmel Live when the host pressed her on the appraisal.

As she told it, she was goaded into giving an answer by a pushy interviewer, and would never actually consider getting her chest insured:

“I was doing an interview and somebody said ‘Oh, all of these people are insuring their parts’, and they were naming off all these different parts and they were like, ‘Would you insure the ladies?’ And I said, ‘No! I’m not gonna, you know…’ And they were like, ‘Well, how much would you do it for if you did?’ So I just threw out a number trying to get them to move on and the next thing I know, my brother’s calling me and he’s like ‘You’re doing what?!’”

Which is all well and good, except when you listen to the original interview, here’s what she told the reporter:

“If somebody was like, ‘Hey, you know what, we would like to insure your boobs for $2.5 million, I’d be like, ‘Do it. Love it. Why not?”

We tend to agree — if someone else is paying the insurance premium, why wouldn’t you do it?

Watch a TV Replay breakdown of the two interviews below, and scroll down for the full Jimmy Kimmel clip:



  • Anonymous

    Sounds reasonable, truthfully… ask yourself, if she lost one or both of her breasts, would it impact her acting income? Would it impact her advertisers or her show? Absolutely.

  • http://www.facebook.com/carrie.arick Carrie Arick

    why is her clevage censored on the mediaite homepage?

  • Rick

    Her boobs are her talent. Insure those puppies before they run off.

    $5 miilion just doesn’t get what it used to or in Pam Anderson’s case perhaps it gets you more.

  • http://www.facebook.com/shawn.schaitel Shawn Schaitel

    CAN I SQUEEZE.

  • http://24ahead.com/ 24AheadDotCom

    Because mediaite wanted you to think she was doing something truly classey with them, like grabbing a couple of fried eggs and holding the eggs on them*.

    * Not that I think he’s funny, but that’s a Steve Martin about meeting Jackie O.

  • http://www.kitengela.com/ Keyur Amin

    You are free to do so. Enjoy

  • http://ja-js.blogtownhall.com Chuck Fowler

    Whether JLH wants to insure them or not, I’ve got some things I’d like to do with and to them……….pleeeeeeze.

  • http://ja-js.blogtownhall.com Chuck Fowler

    At least JLH’s are natural.

© 2013 Styleite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Terms of Service | Archives | Power Grid FAQ | Style Sheets FAQ | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram

X