1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Kim Kardashian Made (Not Spent) $18 Million On Her Wedding

As you’re well aware, Kim Kardashian is now married to Kris Humphries. While we won’t get to see the wedding in its entirety until the four-hour E! special airs in October, we do know quite a few details. Like, for example, that Kim made a pretty penny on the event.

The New York Post estimates that the reality star and her new husband made at least $17.9 million on the affair. Yes, made (not spent). How do they figure this? The couple is getting paid $15 million for the two-part TV special entitled “Kim’s Fairytale Wedding: A Kardashian Event”. They sold rights to their wedding photos for $2.5 million to People, who also shelled out $300,000 for the rights to their exclusive engagement announcement. Kim and Kris also made some cash by selling rights to the bridal shower pics to OK! and getting paid to have Kim’s bacherlorette party at Tao.

Of course, they also got a whole lot of crap for free. Kim’ s Vera Wang wedding dress (plus two other Wang dresses), the Lehr & Black invitations, the Hansen’s Bakery wedding cake, Perrier Jouet champagne, and hair and makeup services were all comped. The estimate on these items alone nears $650,000. Not to mention the couple received a hefty discount on Kim’s $2 million engagement ring, as well as $1 million wedding bands from Kardashian pal Lorraine Schwartz.

Other things they very possibly didn’t pay for include the rental on Montecito’s Sotto Il Monte estate (current home of venture capitalist Frank Caulfield), extravagant $2 million floral arrangements, performances by Stevie Wonder and Earth, Wind and Fire, and grub like caviar and Kobe beef burgers. And did you know they’ll be throwing yet another wedding party in New York at Capitale? Jeez.

Anyway, while we won’t be able to see pictures until People releases them later this week, we do have some intel on what was worn. Kim’s ivory gown had a “full tulle skirt, basque waist, and hand-pieced Chantilly lace appliqué on the bodice and train”. She had two costume changes later in the evening, both also ivory Vera Wang dresses. According to People, “the first was a Georgette mermaid gown with hand-pieced Chantilly lace appliqué on the bodice and a skirt with hand-cut organza petals intermixed with Chantilly lace motifs and organza sprig embroidery”, and the second was a “bias-cut crepe back satin gown with V-neck and circle skirt”. She went with Giuseppe Zanotti for footwear, and carried a Judith Lieber clutch at the reception.

Kris wore an Ermengildo Zegna tux with black pants, a white peak lapel jacket, and a white bow tie. His groomsmen (including Rob Kardashian) and the fathers of the bride and groom wore coordinating tuxes, albeit with black jackets and bow ties. Kris later changed into a black jacket and bow tie, as well. There’s no word on what the rest of the bridal party wore, but Kourtney and Khloe were the co-maids of honor, and Kendall and Kylie Jenner were bridesmaids along with Kris’s sister Kaela (yes, another K name). Kourtney’s son Mason was the ring bearer.

And just to continue the Kardashian wedding info dump, among the 440 guests were Lindsay Logan, Eva Longoria, Kathie Lee Gifford, Venus and Serena Williams, Demi Lovato, Ryan Seacrest, Avril Lavigne, and A.C. Slater Mario Lopez.

[NYP, People]



  • Glamourgal

    spellcheck

  • Anonymous

    This is so F’ED UP.  This is why America is in the crapper, when media pushes values like these onto the public.

  • Anonymous

    I will NEVER understand why rich people get everything for free and the regular citizens pay up for everything.

  • Peanutsworld805

    wow this makes me sick to think what a wast of money the network should send some of that money to help in poor people in africa 

  • Anonymous

    This family has zero talent.  We are not watching and paying for entertainment from talented performers.  We are watching a spectacle pushed down our throats by the corporations who are paid sponsors of this trash.  We are captives of the corporations’s marketing machines – this trash is not our American royalty – I like it that Piers Morgan had what’s her face Kim on his show and asked “So, how’re sales of your porno tape going?” 

  • Kevinlonergan2

    durty skank

  • justcause

    I’ve been asking the same question for yyyyyyyyyyyyears, lol

  • Anonymous

    famewhority giving the result

  • Anonymous

    We’re supposed to see them wearing/using things and then want those things for ourselves. Except that we have to save up and pay up for them. We’re supposed to think “Now I’ll be just like Kim Kardashian! Happy, pretty, carefree!!” But the truth is, I’d just be out all that money.

    If there were anyone there I could afford to boycott instead, maybe I’d do that! :)

  • newstip579

    If you don’t like the Kardashians don’t watch the show. Don’t buy their products. E-mail the shopping channels that hawk their merchandise -let them know you’ll be boycotting not only K. products but the channel too. That kept Fonda from hawking her book on Q. Same with the manufacturers of products they endorse like Poise. The backlash is starting -some US major news outlets already cutting coverage of this family due to hundreds of negative comments posted. 

  • Anonymous

    It’s ridiculous to be honest… I think most Americans have caught on to this form of advertising. More and more I see bloggers getting free things (though definitely not to this extent) as a new means of advertising so we can see the everyday folk wearing expensive clothing and shoes to make us think that if they wear it, we should be able to also. America is such a sad sad country. :( And I live here.

  • Anonymous

    If I were a blogger getting free things to review, I would limit it to things that I might actually buy with my own income and that I honestly think my friends would benefit from and could actually buy with their own incomes. I’m with you that this this kind of advertising is ridiculous. (Although I have to say the “reverse advertising” of Abercrombie and Fitch asking The Situation to NOT wear his clothes, and the thing with Coach “gifting” Snooki a Gucci purse, is kind of amusing.) All this sound and fury, signifying nothing (as Shakespeare said).

© 2013 Styleite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Terms of Service | Archives | Power Grid FAQ | Style Sheets FAQ | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram

X