After a slewof soloappearancesin awesomeensembles, Kristen Stewart finally reunitedwithRobert Pattison for the premiere of The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2 in Los Angeles last night. Stewart bared it all in a nude, strapless, and sheer Zuhair Murad gown that gave everyone an eyeful when she turned around. Of course, she wore a nude undergarments, but photos make the star look, well, naked. Pattinson, on the other hand, wore what looked like a wax-coated green Gucci suit.
As for the rest of the red carpet, our only complaint is Elle Fanning‘s Prada ensemble. Yes, she’s adorable and takes all sorts of fashionrisks, but those thong flatforms. We have no words.
See Stewart and Pattinson’s red carpet reunion, and the rest of the cast below:
Pattinson nailed it as usual (another fabulous Gucci tailoring sample) and he hasn’t worn a colour like that for a long time. The dress is gorgeous in a way (and is there anything Stewart looks bad in?), but it looks like the original version of it had more volume and it would have only worked to Stewart’s advantage, had she opted for that one. Otherwise, she should have worn seamless lingerie – these pants are just too tight on her bottom which is a shame as she’s got the perfect figure and this malfunction could have been avoided.All in all, one thing is certain: no one has ever looked better at Twilight premieres than Pattinson and Stewart.
Living out loud
Wow, wow, wow. Gorgeous but needs underwear–she well knows!! She’s trying to break away from that kids genre of movies–and she’s smart. She has to get away from Pattison. This might be the way to do it–not really the right way, but.. lol Gorgeous dress gets too distracted with nothin much underneath. haha peace Happy Holidays
GC
Mae West wore a see through one in the 30′s!
Well Spoken
With all due respect, Ms. Wong, your stab at creating the idea of a
wardrobe malfunction in Zuhad Muhair’s elegant creation was, in my
opinion, a failed attempt at journalism altogether. To disparage this
gorgeous Muhair gown in a blatant attempt to smear Kristen Stewart on
what was a lovely night for her, her cast mates and fans alike, is as
incorrigible as it is irresponsible.
The deliberate misuse of the
term “malfunction” in regards to her wardrobe, insinuates some
accidental or unintentional overexposure. However, I can assure you, as
anyone with half a neuron could, that there is nothing accidental about
the design, flow or fit of that dress, and if its alleged “nudeness”
offends you, perhaps you should consider a new line of work better
suited to your delicate sensibility and taste – a food critic might be a
safer bet for you, Ms. Wong.
But for those of us with stomach
enough to admit that Kristen was nothing short of stunning in that dress
can attest that all things were functioning perfectly, as planned. Your
premeditated misappropriation of the term “wardrobe malfunction,” a
term you well know will forever be associated with that special night
when it is searched online, was both ill chosen and just plain tacky.
Since
you’re obviously experiencing some difficulty in interpreting the
essence of this dress, and are struggling with it’s being “too sheer
from the rear,” kindly allow me to assist you. For an accurate
journalistic examination of the dress, lean sharply forward towards your
screen and take a thorough second look at the back of Ms. Stewart’s
gown. You will finally notice that, in fact, there never was a
malfunction in the sheerness of Zuhad
Muhair’s gown as it spoke for itself and Kristen quite clearly in stating: kiss my mother-f***ing ass. Good day.
jeff cole
Kristen Stewart a BOOB JOB and REHAB for something and she may be a lasting memory. Right now she is just NEW MEAT making her way.
RSS
