<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Downside To Plus-Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.styleite.com/media/plus-size-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.styleite.com/media/plus-size-study/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2012.06</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathy kitt</title>
		<link>http://www.styleite.com/media/plus-size-study/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy kitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.styleite.com/?p=3747#comment-78</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a problem with this whole &quot;plus size&quot; issue.  What constitutes plus size.  It seems that the begining of the plus size range is getting smaller and smaller.  So, those of us who were a &quot;normal&quot; size have suddenly been bumped up to plus size.  I don&#039;t like being considered plus size.  It doesn&#039;t make me feel better about myself.  I obviously need to do something about my body type so I can fit into the clothing that is not plus size.  I am not spending my money on plus size clothing.

As to the idea that this is a trend is probably wrong.  It&#039;s just a way to pretend that they have heard the need for RTW that fits the average shopper.  Nothing changes, the clothing that didn&#039;t fit before still doesn&#039;t fit.

The Marc Jacobs show for Louis Vuitton was a great show with stunnung dresses.  They had a wonderful vintage feel to them and were dresses that I think would be more forgiving.  But forgiving doesn&#039;t equal more wearable for women who were the more average, normal sizes.

I tend believe what Kate Moss said &quot;nothing tastes as good as skinny feels&quot;.  Kate Moss knows this industry.  Let&#039;s ask her what she thinks about the movement to plus size selling in the stores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a problem with this whole &#8220;plus size&#8221; issue.  What constitutes plus size.  It seems that the begining of the plus size range is getting smaller and smaller.  So, those of us who were a &#8220;normal&#8221; size have suddenly been bumped up to plus size.  I don&#8217;t like being considered plus size.  It doesn&#8217;t make me feel better about myself.  I obviously need to do something about my body type so I can fit into the clothing that is not plus size.  I am not spending my money on plus size clothing.</p>
<p>As to the idea that this is a trend is probably wrong.  It&#8217;s just a way to pretend that they have heard the need for RTW that fits the average shopper.  Nothing changes, the clothing that didn&#8217;t fit before still doesn&#8217;t fit.</p>
<p>The Marc Jacobs show for Louis Vuitton was a great show with stunnung dresses.  They had a wonderful vintage feel to them and were dresses that I think would be more forgiving.  But forgiving doesn&#8217;t equal more wearable for women who were the more average, normal sizes.</p>
<p>I tend believe what Kate Moss said &#8220;nothing tastes as good as skinny feels&#8221;.  Kate Moss knows this industry.  Let&#8217;s ask her what she thinks about the movement to plus size selling in the stores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicki2</title>
		<link>http://www.styleite.com/media/plus-size-study/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.styleite.com/?p=3747#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the plus size trend will endure, but what&#039;s confusing is the definition of plus sized.  Historically in fashion sizing, a plus size was 14 or 16 and up, but now it seems to be a size 10 and up.  Now that&#039;s just wrong.

If the move toward showing a size 10 goes back to being usual, then fine, and that&#039;s as it should be, but a size 10 isn&#039;t a plus size either.  Sure, it&#039;s semantics, but it&#039;s also much more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the plus size trend will endure, but what&#8217;s confusing is the definition of plus sized.  Historically in fashion sizing, a plus size was 14 or 16 and up, but now it seems to be a size 10 and up.  Now that&#8217;s just wrong.</p>
<p>If the move toward showing a size 10 goes back to being usual, then fine, and that&#8217;s as it should be, but a size 10 isn&#8217;t a plus size either.  Sure, it&#8217;s semantics, but it&#8217;s also much more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

